Filigran vs. Anomali: a comparative analysis
Filigran’s OpenCTI and Anomali’s ThreatStream are both powerful threat intelligence platforms - but only one is built to power an agentic, threat-informed defense loop. Which one is right for your security operations?
OpenCTI has emerged as the strongest alternative to Anomali
Driving long-term innovation in threat management.
Innovating with intent
Filigran is investing in the sustained advancement of OpenCTI, ensuring it stands the test of time and evolves with customer requirements.
Improve security posture
Use prioritized threat intelligence to drive adversarial exposure validation assessments with OpenAEV - natively integrated.
Built with you, for you
An open-source platform developed by TI practitioners and enhanced with TI community feedback - you get what real users require from the platform.
We listen. We act.
Part of our open-source DNA is to be prompt in our response - to our community and to our customers.
Clarity, simplicity and full access
OpenCTI Enterprise Edition has a transparent, simplified pricing structure: you get access to everything, with no additional or hidden costs.
Want to know more?
Talk to the Filigran team to learn more about the Enterprise Edition offer.
Contact usSelect capabilities that matter to you
Compare the key capabilities of OpenCTI and ThreatStream, condensed from our full comparative analysis of 17 capability areas - and learn when OpenCTI is the better choice.
Filigran OpenCTI
Best in class on 12 of the 17 capabilities evaluated.
- Automation and no-code playbooks
- Custom dashboards without limits
- Dedicated 24/7 customer support
- Full STIX 2.1 data modelization
- Data segregation with granular RBAC
- Data de-duplication and entity merge
- SaaS, on-premise and air-gap deployments with full parity
- User-defined confidence scoring (1-100)
- Built-in intelligence sharing and dissemination
- MITRE ATT&CK mapping
- Reporting and finished-intelligence templates
- AI assistant across import, enrichment and analysis
Anomali ThreatStream
Where ThreatStream still stands out in the comparison.
- Desktop client and browser extension
- Integrated sandbox for detonation
- Premium threat intelligence feed marketplace
- MITRE ATT&CK mapping
- Reporting and templates
- Threat intelligence feed integrations
How to read this comparison
Each capability was scored on maturity and completeness, from partial to best-in-class coverage. OpenCTI leads or matches ThreatStream on 14 of the 17 capabilities evaluated, including automation and playbooks, STIX 2.1 data modelization, custom dashboards, customer support, deployment flexibility, confidence scoring and intelligence sharing.
ThreatStream keeps an edge on desktop tooling, integrated sandboxing and its premium feed marketplace. If those three capabilities top your list, compare both platforms hands-on - and if automation, open standards and total cost of ownership matter more, OpenCTI is the stronger choice.
Trusted by users all over the world
Let’s talk!
Tell us about your threat intelligence challenges - our team will show you how OpenCTI compares for your use cases.